Proxima Nova's ‘M' is also narrower with a lower vertex, while Montserrat's ‘M' is wider with a high vertex. One difference between the two is the single-story ‘a' in Proxima Nova, compared to the double-story ‘a' in Montserrat. It mirrors Montserrat's balance of classic proportions and modern, minimalist sensibilities. Its letterforms are similar to Montserrat in terms of x-height and letter-spacing, which results in a similar level of readability. On the other hand it’s also paid.ĭesigned by Mark Simonson, this magical typeface combines the geometric style of modern sans-serifs with the proportions and spacing of old-style grotesques. It is clean, modern, readable and simply amazing. All of these characteristics align with Montserrat's overall feel and therefore I think it’s really a great Montserrat alternative.Īh, how I love Proxima Nova. Another critical difference is in their ‘a' and ‘g' characters: Roboto opts for a single-story ‘a' and a double-story ‘g', the opposite of Montserrat's choices.ĭespite these differences, Roboto maintains a modern, friendly quality and it also offers a comprehensive range of weights, from Thin to Black, matching Montserrat's breadth of styles. This is apparent in letters like ‘R', where Roboto's leg curves outward more than Montserrat's, and ‘B', where Montserrat's vertical stem is perfectly straight, while Roboto's has a subtle curve. Roboto uses geometric construction as its core but tends to implement a softer and more open curve than Montserrat, making it appear a little more informal. This balance is similar to Montserrat's blend of geometric shapes and humanistic letterforms. Raleway, like Montserrat, has a substantial range of weights, which makes it an adaptable typeface and in my opinion great Montserrat alternative.ĭesigned by Christian Robertson for Google, Roboto is a typeface that combines mechanical structure and geometric form with more open, natural curves. However, both fonts have wide apertures and large x-heights, making them readable and flexible in various design contexts. Raleway's ‘Q' also sets it apart with its crossed tail, while Montserrat's ‘Q' tail is short and curled. While Montserrat is known for its unique double-story ‘g', Raleway features a single-story ‘g' with a distinctive curled ear. Raleway's letterforms are slender, similar to Montserrat's regular weight, but Raleway's capitals are significantly more extended, which gives the font a more stylized look. It brings an air of elegance and sophistication that differs from Montserrat's more straightforward, utilitarian style. Some history: Raleway is originally a single-weight display font designed by Matt McInerney, and was later expanded into a full nine-weight family by Pablo Impallari and Rodrigo Fuenzalida. I personally use it quite a lot, because it just fits anywhere. They both bring certain elegance and modernity to their designs, so if you want to try a new and clean font similar to Montserrat yet unique in some way, try using Work Sans. Work Sans' stroke width is more uniform, whereas Montserrat allows for subtle contrasts in thickness. But overall shapes of each letter are very similar to Montserrat, especially in its thinner forms.ĭesigned by Wei Huang with an emphasis on being optimized for screens & drawing inspiration from early grotesques, Work Sans manages to balance a certain level of neutrality with friendly, approachable undertones.īoth fonts share a propensity for open, clear letterforms, contributing to their readability and functionality at various sizes. Some letter shapes differ, especially in heavier weights, so that might make an overall difference in a big pile of text. If you look at the picture, you’ll probably agree with me, that it resembles of Montserrat in many ways. We will continue with this free and beautiful typeface called Work Sans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |